Representative Cases

Some lawyers avoid trials because they know trial work
is not their strength. We are different. We try cases.

Find out the Toomey Difference.

CONTACT US TODAY

About Our Cases

It’s no secret that most civil cases do not go to trial. Most cases are settled. Only if they are not settled, or dismissed, are they tried. Trial lawyers with experience are more important than ever because fewer lawyers have the opportunity to try cases before civil juries. All lawyers went to law school, but not all belong in court. The prospect for trial is frightening for many lawyers, particularly if trial is not their normal activity or if a case is headed to federal court. If your lawyer doesn’t try cases, it affects the ability to settle cases favorably because there is no threat of trial. The other lawyers know whether your lawyer can try the case, and use that knowledge to advantage. Whether your lawyer can try the case has a definite impact on the case, whether it is tried or settled.


Our cases speak for us:

  • Meister v. Scott, Case No. 08-14707 (U.S. September 25, 2008)
  • Jones v. St. Lucie Sheriff, Case No. 07-13402 (U.S. October 28, 2008)
  • U.S. vs. Cabrales, 524 U.S. 1 (1998) (uncredited amicus brief)
  • McGathey v. Safron, Case No.
  • Ross v. Corizon, 2017 Lexis 11702 (11th Cir. (2017)
  • Denham v. Corizon, 675 Fed. Appx. 930 (11th Cir. 2017)
  • Spadaro v. City of Miramar, 591 Fed. Appx. 908 (11th Cir. 2015)
  • Romano v. PHS, Case No. 14-13199 (11thCir. March 11, 2015)
  • Criner v. Hernandez, 562 Fed. Appx. (11th Cir 2014)
  • Reddick v. Chauvin, Case No. 14-11043 (11th Cir. April 22, 2014)
  • Faulkner vs. Monroe County, U.S. App. Lexis 14747 (11th Cir. 2013)
  • Faulkner v. Maurer, Case No. 12-11385 (11th Cir. August 23, 2013)
  • Fields vs. Corizon Health, 490 Fed. Appx. 174 (11th Cir. 2012)
  • Kibwika v. BSO, Case No. 11-11297 (11th Cir. March 5, 2012)
  • Dillard vs. Florida Dept. Juvenile Justice, 427 Fed. Appx. 809 (11th Cir. 2011)
  • Henderson v. St. Lucie, Case No. 11-12035 (11th Cir. July 27, 2011)
  • Minton v. Volusia, Case No. 10-13622 (11th Cir. April 22, 2011)
  • Hall v. FDOC, Case No. 10-13587 (11th Cir. February 14, 2011)
  • Burgest vs. Jenne, 316 Fed. Appx. 995 (11th Cir. 2009)
  • Cottone vs. Jenne, 288 Fed Appx. 620 (11th Cir. (2008)
  • Kibwika vs. BSO, 453 Fed. Appx. 915, (11th Cir. 2012)
  • Hardy vs. BSO, 238 Fed. Appx. 435, (11th Cir. 2007)
  • Hicks vs. Jenne, 213 Fed. Appx. 800 (11th Cir. 2007)
  • Hawthorne vs. BSO, 212 Fed. Appx. 943 (11th Cir. 2007)
  • Goebert vs. Lee County, 510 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir.2007)
  • Lannen vs. BSO, 2013 U.S. Dist. Lexis 47735 (SD Fla. 2013)
  • Spadaro vs. City of Miramar, 2013 U.S. Dist. Lexis 16714 (SD Fla. 2013)
  • Spadaro vs. City of Miramar, 2012 U.S. Dist. Lexis 117925 (SD Fla. 2012)
  • Spadaro vs. City of Miramar, 2012 U.S. Dist. Lexis 103278 (SD Fla. 2012)
  • Lannen vs. BSO, 2012 U.S. Dist. Lexis 187448 (SD Fla. 2012)
  • Horn vs. Volusia County, 2008 U.S. Dist. Lexis 61426 (MD Fla. 2008)
  • Garcia vs. Lifemark Hospitals, 754 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1999); rev. denied, 779 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 2000)
  • Griffin v. Corizon, 193 So. 3d 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
  • Fuller v. Rambosk, 181 So. 3d 491 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2015)
  • Dillard v. PHS, 174 So. 3d 1002 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2015)
  • Crain vs. Prison Health Services, 80 So. 3d 1084 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2012)
  • Darling vs. Palm Beach County Sheriff, 2 So. 3d 368 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
  • Fischer vs. Freedman, 947 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2007)
  • Lindstrom vs. Broward County, 755 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)

Ready to see The Toomey Law Firm difference?

Contact us today to setup your consultation!

Contact Us